If a study reports a 95% CI for the mean of (2.1, 5.7), which interpretation is correct?

Master CRINQ's Descriptive, Inferential, and Clinical Statistics with our practice test. Tackle multiple choice questions, each with detailed explanations, to ensure you're fully prepared. Ready for your exam!

Multiple Choice

If a study reports a 95% CI for the mean of (2.1, 5.7), which interpretation is correct?

Explanation:
A confidence interval for a mean expresses how often the estimation method would capture the true population mean if we repeated the study many times. The true mean is fixed, while the interval we compute from each sample varies. So a 95% interval means that in repeated samples, about 95% of the intervals would contain the true mean. For this interval, we can’t say there is a 95% probability that the true mean lies between 2.1 and 5.7, because the parameter isn’t random—the interval method is. We also wouldn’t claim the true mean is certainly between those values; there’s still uncertainty from sampling. And this interval does not say that 95% of population values lie in it—that would be about individual observations, not the mean. The correct interpretation is that, in the long run, 95% of similarly constructed intervals would cover the true mean.

A confidence interval for a mean expresses how often the estimation method would capture the true population mean if we repeated the study many times. The true mean is fixed, while the interval we compute from each sample varies. So a 95% interval means that in repeated samples, about 95% of the intervals would contain the true mean. For this interval, we can’t say there is a 95% probability that the true mean lies between 2.1 and 5.7, because the parameter isn’t random—the interval method is. We also wouldn’t claim the true mean is certainly between those values; there’s still uncertainty from sampling. And this interval does not say that 95% of population values lie in it—that would be about individual observations, not the mean. The correct interpretation is that, in the long run, 95% of similarly constructed intervals would cover the true mean.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy